Review



rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Proteintech rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Human Irf3 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 437 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+human+irf3+antibody/pmc12915935-281-35-42?v=Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 437 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients"

    Article Title: Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients

    Journal: PLOS One

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342756

    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.

    Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, MANN-WHITNEY

    A . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated papillary subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm. B . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated tubular subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: A . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated papillary subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm. B . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated tubular subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm.

    Techniques Used: Staining, Expressing

    (A–E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing patients with low and moderate-to-high expression of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A–E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing patients with low and moderate-to-high expression of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test.

    Techniques Used: Expressing



    Similar Products

    rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Human Irf3 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+human+irf3+antibody/pmc12915935-281-35-42?v=Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    anti human irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody  (Boster Bio)
    94
    Boster Bio anti human irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Anti Human Irf3 Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+human+irf3+antibody/pm38914152-91-0-9?v=Boster+Bio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human irf3 rabbit polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3
    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, <t>IRF3,</t> and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Human Irf3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+human+irf3+antibody/pmc05571243-658-49-71?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti human irf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Immunohistochemical staining of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α was evaluated across multiple TMA slides and categorized as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). (B) Distribution of H-scores for each antibody across 164 cases. H-scores were categorized into two groups: Weak (0–150), Moderate to high (151–300). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare two groups, *p < 0.001. Represents images acquired at 20 × magnification.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used included a rabbit polyclonal Gamma H2A.X antibody (phosphor S139) (γH2AFX; dilution 1:400, ab11174; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-human c-GAS antibody (dilution 1:200, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human STING antibody (dilution 1:3000, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human IRF3 antibody (dilution 1:800, Proteintech, US), and rabbit polyclonal anti-human IFN alpha antibody (dilution 1:50, Proteintech, US).

    Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, MANN-WHITNEY

    A . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated papillary subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm. B . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated tubular subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated papillary subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm. B . (A-C) FFPE from a CCA patients of H&E staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm of Well, Moderate and Poorly differentiated tubular subtype. (D-F) Weak (1+), Moderate (2+), or Strong (3+) of IRF3 expression patterns. Represents staining, 20X, scale bar = 100 µm.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used included a rabbit polyclonal Gamma H2A.X antibody (phosphor S139) (γH2AFX; dilution 1:400, ab11174; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-human c-GAS antibody (dilution 1:200, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human STING antibody (dilution 1:3000, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human IRF3 antibody (dilution 1:800, Proteintech, US), and rabbit polyclonal anti-human IFN alpha antibody (dilution 1:50, Proteintech, US).

    Techniques: Staining, Expressing

    (A–E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing patients with low and moderate-to-high expression of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Prognostic value of cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma patients

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342756

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing patients with low and moderate-to-high expression of γH2AX, cGAS, STING, IRF3, and IFN-α. P-values were calculated using the log-rank test.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used included a rabbit polyclonal Gamma H2A.X antibody (phosphor S139) (γH2AFX; dilution 1:400, ab11174; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-human c-GAS antibody (dilution 1:200, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human STING antibody (dilution 1:3000, Proteintech, US), rabbit polyclonal anti-human IRF3 antibody (dilution 1:800, Proteintech, US), and rabbit polyclonal anti-human IFN alpha antibody (dilution 1:50, Proteintech, US).

    Techniques: Expressing